HARRY POTTER AND THE DEATHLY HALLOWS: Part 2 (2011)

Review by Derrick Carter

Running Time: 2 hours 10 minutes

MPAA Rating: PG-13 for some sequences of Intense Action Violence and Frightening Images

deathlyhallows2-poster

Directed by: David Yates

Written by: Steve Kloves

(based on the novel HARRY POTTER AND THE DEATHLY HALLOWS by J.K. Rowling)

Starring: Daniel Radcliffe, Rupert Grint, Emma Watson, Helena Bonham Carter, Robbie Coltrane, Warwick Davis, Tom Felton, Ralph Fiennes, Michael Gambon, John Hurt, Jason Isaacs, Kelly Macdonald, Gary Oldman, Alan Rickman, Maggie Smith & David Thewlis

Though the decision to split HARRY POTTER AND THE DEATHLY HALLOWS into two films still seems like a mistake on Warner Bros.’ part, this eighth (and final) film in the HARRY POTTER saga is cinematically spectacular final installment nonetheless. Sure, Part 2 understandably feels like the second half of a better whole, but that narrative flaw doesn’t have nearly the same impact in dipping quality that 2010’s Part 1 saw. Details from the previous films come into play, major plot revelations about certain characters come to light, and the HARRY POTTER saga comes to an emotionally satisfying conclusion.

deathlyhallows2-1

After narrowly escaping the clutches of Death Eaters, Harry Potter (Daniel Radcliffe), Ron (Rupert Grint), and Hermione (Emma Watson) are searching for Voldemort’s remaining Horcruxes (dark magical objects that contain pieces of his soul). Their magical scavenger hunt takes them into the dark vaults of Gringotts Bank and then to Hogwarts School of Witchcraft and Wizardry. With only three Horcruxes left and Voldemort (Ralph Fiennes) determined to kill “chosen one” Harry, Hogwarts will become the battleground for a massive confrontation. Prophecies will be fulfilled, truths will be revealed, deaths will occur on both sides and a final battle will decide the fate of the wizarding world.

deathlyhallows2-2

DEATHLY HALLOWS: Part 2 is the exciting second half of a cohesive whole. This leads to some narrative issues as viewers will have to be fresh off DEATHLY HALLOWS: Part 1 to fully appreciate Part 2 picking up mere seconds after that far lesser film concluded. There are only two major settings in this movie: Gringotts and Hogwarts. Gringotts Wizarding Bank was briefly glimpsed in THE SORCERER’S STONE, but Part 2 treats the viewer to a more in-depth look at the Goblin-run bank’s treacherous vaults filled with curses, elaborate security precautions and a show-stopping set piece that delivers excitement early on. As for Hogwarts, old places and familiar faces come into play as Harry desperately searches the corridors for a hidden chunk of Voldemort’s soul.

deathlyhallows2-3

In terms of spectacle, DEATHLY HALLOWS: Part 2 delivers action that fans wanted to see on the big screen since the series began. There’s a massive battle featuring damn near every major character and supporting actor from the previous films, even Jim Broadbent and Emma Thompson pop in just to reprise their professors in the final conflict. The special effects and make-up work are just as solid as ever, though director David Yates occasionally goes a bit too over-the-top during final Harry vs. Voldemort fight. Though a tense wand duel throughout Hogwarts is stellar, a scene of Voldemort and Harry whizzing through the air like Superman is silly to say the least.

deathlyhallows2-4

There is no need to recap this final film’s many performances, because we’ve seen all these characters and cast members before. Nothing has changed in their greatness. However, I will say that there’s a sense of maturity in seeing these beloved characters and the series as a whole grow throughout the years. There’s something deeply satisfying about watching the conclusion to this eight-film-long franchise, be it from sheer nostalgia or fantastic storytelling. Voldemort’s speech to the tearful wizards and witches of Hogwarts is affecting. Two major plot revelations bring about the yearning to rewatch previous entries and cast a new light on the series as a whole. However, the titular Deathly Hallows once again feel like a throwaway subplot that’s merely there as a cheap plot device. Also, Alan Rickman’s Snape story arc delivers one of the most emotional sequences in the entire series.

deathlyhallows2-5

Would HARRY POTTER AND THE DEATHLY HALLOWS have functioned better as one big three-hour film? I think so and it might have stood next to PRISONER OF AZKABAN as the best film of the series. Part 2 and (to an annoying degree) Part 1 both have scenes that could have been excised for a tighter, better film. I feel this finale could have functioned better as one long seventh movie. Still, in spite of being the second half of a whole story, DEATHLY HALLOWS: Part 2 stands as one of the better films in the long-running fantasy series. Plot points are wrapped up in emotional ways with revelations that cast a new light on previous movies. We get to spend one last time with a large cast of beloved characters. The battle at Hogwarts also stands as the series’ most epic moment. DEATHLY HALLOWS: Part 2 is a deeply satisfying final installment to an unforgettable cinematic saga.

Grade: A-

HARRY POTTER AND THE DEATHLY HALLOWS: Part 1 (2010)

Review by Derrick Carter

Running Time: 2 hours 26 minutes

MPAA Rating: PG-13 for some sequences of Intense Action Violence, Frightening Images and brief Sensuality

225278id1g_HP7_27x40_1Sheet.indd

Directed by: David Yates

Written by: Steve Kloves

(based on the novel HARRY POTTER AND THE DEATHLY HALLOWS by J.K. Rowling)

Starring: Daniel Radcliffe, Rupert Grint, Emma Watson, Helena Bonham Carter, Robbie Coltrane, Warwick Davis, Tom Felton, Ralph Fiennes, Michael Gambon, Brendan Gleeson, John Hurt, Rhys Ifans, Jason Isaacs, Bill Nighy, Alan Rickman, Timothy Spall, Imelda Staunton & David Thewlis

Confession time: HARRY POTTER AND THE DEATHLY HALLOWS is probably my least favorite book in the series. It’s an underwhelming conclusion to a groundbreaking fantasy series. However, the material seemed like it would make an exciting film. Enter the Warner Bros. execs who upon realizing they only had one HARRY POTTER adaptation left to milk for cash decided to keep the blockbuster train rolling for two more films. Though many fans seemed initially disappointed by the studio’s route, that didn’t stop this seventh film from becoming the third-highest grossing HARRY POTTER title in the franchise (behind the eighth film and the first film). DEATHLY HALLOWS: Part 1 isn’t a bad movie. It’s better than a majority of split book adaptations (e.g. THE HOBBIT: AN UNEXPECTED JOURNEY and THE HUNGER GAMES: MOCKINGJAY Part 1), but that doesn’t overshadow the fact that this is still half a story being stretched into over two hours.

deathlyhallows1-1

In the aftermath of Dumbledore’s death, the wizarding world has become dark and hopeless. Lord Voldemort (Ralph Fiennes) is tightening his grip on the Ministry of Magic and Severus Snape (Alan Rickman) is taking over Hogwarts School of Witchcraft and Wizardry. Chosen one Harry Potter (Daniel Radcliffe) is Voldemort’s prime target, which has led secretive rebel group Order of the Phoenix to stage a complicated rescue mission. After some casualties ensue and Voldemort’s Death Eaters find the Order’s location, Harry, Ron (Rupert Grint) and Hermione (Emma Watson) venture out on their own to track down Voldemort’s secret Horcruxes, magical objects that contain pieces of his soul. These dark magical objects must be destroyed in order to kill the Dark Lord…and the trio kick off their deadly scavenger hunt by hunting down a cursed locket.

deathlyhallows1-2

While the HARRY POTTER series had been progressively getting darker and darker through the previous six films, DEATHLY HALLOWS: Part 1 ranks as the most depressing installment of the series. Part of this might be attributed to the “To Be Continued…” ending, while another reason easily comes from major character deaths that might shock those who haven’t read the material beforehand. However, I feel the main reason that DEATHLY HALLOWS: Part 1 succeeds in being a suspenseful installment is because Harry, Ron and Hermione become fugitives. The corrupt wizard government no longer offers any safeguards towards the chosen one and is actively following Voldemort’s agenda. The lack of a safety net and danger coming from all directions offer a feeling of dread that the series has previously never seen before.

deathlyhallows1-3

It should come as no surprise that Daniel Radcliffe, Rupert Grint, and Emma Watson slip right back into their iconic roles with ease. Though the rising threats cause tensions to erupt between their characters. Much like the film’s dark tone, this isn’t necessarily something completely new in the series but it’s never been executed to this degree. When we see longtime grudges emerge and drama between the three best friends, it’s a bit tough to watch because we’ve come to love these characters for so long. Still, these are the same protagonists, just more mature and grown up. Harry is just as courageous as ever. Hermione is smart and frequently gets the group out of trouble. Ron delivers comic relief that attempts to brighten up the rather depressing plot.

deathlyhallows1-4

Other familiar faces return with Dobby (the most annoying character in the series), Mad-Eye Moody (Brendan Gleeson), worst teacher ever Dolores Umbridge (Imelda Staunton), a cameo from Wormtail (Timothy Spall), a hardly glimpsed Ollivander (John Hurt), a psychotic Bellatrix Lestrange (Helena Bonham Carter), and many more. Ralph Fiennes has two scenes as Voldemort, while Snape’s presence is mostly regulated to the opening prologue. Series newcomers appear in: Bill Nighy as Minister of Magic Rufus Scrimgeour, Andy Linden as scumbag Mundungus Fletcher, Peter Mullan as Death Eater Yaxley, and Rhys Ifans as Luna Lovegood’s eccentric father Xenophilius. All four of these characters serve as plot devices and nothing more.

deathlyhallows1-5

DEATHLY HALLOWS: Part 1 is entertaining and nicely sets up the conclusion to the series, but unfortunately falls victim to an unnecessarily lengthy running time. Perhaps, Part 1 wouldn’t feel underwhelming if this movie wasn’t as long as previous HARRY POTTER entries. There are (at least) 20 minutes that could have been excised for the sake of a tighter running time and a more compelling movie as a whole. The introduction of the titular Deathly Hallows (three legendary magical objects) seems disconnected from the rest of the movie, because the exposition dump functions as an introduction for DEATHLY HALLOWS: Part 2. Also, this plot point directly contradicts a piece of the series that was introduced in SORCERER’S STONE and I’ve never been able to completely overlook that. This sloppy bit of writing leads me to believe that J.K. Rowling didn’t have the series fully mapped out in her head as she was going along.

deathlyhallows1-6

DEATHLY HALLOWS: Part 1 isn’t the worst HARRY POTTER film. GOBLET OF FIRE still holds that title and HALF-BLOOD PRINCE is 75% filler, but Part 1 is still very much the first half of a plot and feels like it. The long running time certainly doesn’t help matters, but there are memorable sequences that stick out for positive reasons. I love the confrontations that Harry, Ron and Hermione have with various Death Eaters, especially a climactic showdown. There are tense scenarios brought up in visiting the Ministry of Magic in disguise and the completion of the cursed locket storyline. This is also the darkest HARRY POTTER film with a “doom and gloom” atmosphere the whole way through. DEATHLY HALLOWS: Part 1 is far from the best installment in the HARRY POTTER series, but still remains a solid movie in the decade-long saga.

Grade: B

BRAVE (2012)

Review by Derrick Carter

Running Time: 1 hour 33 minutes

MPAA Rating: PG for some Scary Action and Rude Humor

Brave poster

Directed by: Mark Andrews, Brenda Chapman & Steve Purcell

Written by: Mark Andrews, Steve Purcell, Brenda Chapman & Irene Mecchi

Voices of: Kelly Macdonald, Emma Thompson, Billy Connolly, Julie Walters, Kevin McKidd, Craig Ferguson, Steve Purcell, Patrick Doyle & John Ratzenberg

Disney’s animation department has been upping their game recently (e.g. FROZEN and WRECK-IT RALPH). It’s highly ironic that Pixar (which used to be the biggest game in town as far as family entertainment went) has recently hit a decline in the quality of their films. In the last three years we’ve seen a bad sequel to an already iffy movie (CARS 2) and an iffy prequel to a good film (MONSTERS UNIVERSITY), but there’s at least been one semi-original effort. This was 2012’s BRAVE. It may have a somewhat creative plot, but the story strictly adheres to many ideas that proved somewhat successful in previous Disney efforts. In this sense, the film is a bit of a mash-up of other (in some cases, better) films. Pixar still appears to have some magic left, because this blended combination works pretty well as a good family entertainment.

Brave 1

Set in medieval Scotland, the story follows Merida, a young princess bound to living by the traditions set forth by her ancestors. Despite Merida’s urge to break free and form her own destiny, Queen Elinor is bound to keep her daughter on the path of becoming a proper princess. Neither seem willing to hear each other out and their relationship, which was once so strong, has become strained. Merida sabotages a competition to find her suitor and the kingdom is thrown into disarray. Desperate for a way out of the impending marriage, Merida seeks the help of a bumbling witch, who casts a spell to change the queen. Unfortunately, Merida wasn’t specific enough and Elinor turns into a bear. With a limited amount of time, Merida and Elinor (who is now in the body of a bear) must mend their broken relationship in a dangerous journey to break the spell before it turns permanent.

Brave 2

Taking visuals into consideration, BRAVE is a beautifully animated piece. Pixar has come along way from the humans in TOY STORY. Even though TANGLED and FROZEN both bear some similar resemblance to the designs in this film, BRAVE seems to have a more amazing three-dimensional aspect to the characters. Another notable point is that Merida does not bear the typical resemblance of what one might describe as a “Disney princess.” She sports a mess of tangled hair, lots of freckles, and is more active than most of the other Disney females. To put it bluntly, she might be seen as a physically active ginger wearing princess clothes. I respect this portrayal completely and think it’s refreshing. More Disney films, cartoons, and live-action movies in general might consider adopting more unconventionally beautiful (e.g. real-looking) people. Not to harp on it, but that’s a really admirable thing about BRAVE.

MCDBRAV EC008

The use of a kingdom in Scotland and myths that surround that location make for another refreshing thing in a kid’s film. I wish more family films would explore other folklore and legends that haven’t been used much. This doesn’t completely excuse the frequent use of clichéd plot developments and a few scenes that could have been cut or replaced to make a better film though. In essence, we’ve seen the formula of a rebellious princess taking a journey to correct a mistake and we’ve seen the idea of a person being transformed into a bear in order to learn a lesson in the 2003’s mostly forgotten BROTHER BEAR (of all things). A good portion of the story does follow a by-the-numbers telling of this fable, but there are some surprisingly great things that pop up too.

Brave 4

One seemingly small detail comes back in a very clever and smart way in the last half. I’m not sure if most kids will catch exactly what it means in terms of the plot, but it was really cool to see things tie up in a smart way. There is a dark animal antagonist that may scare the crap out of younger viewers and I applaud Pixar for not dumbing it down. Sometimes, family entertainment needs a darker side to the danger, which only makes the conclusion that much more satisfying (e.g. the cruel villain in UP). In essence I might compare BRAVE to RATATOUILLE in the story being told is aimed at more mature audiences, but children will get a kick out of the more cartoony parts. It has silly moments, but the film is also complicated in points.

Brave 5

BRAVE is not Pixar’s best film, but it is far better than some of their other earlier efforts (A BUG’S LIFE and CARS) too. It feels much more like an older Disney movie than a full-on Pixar film, which could be seen as something good or a bad. Despite the clichés and overly familiar points, this somehow works out very well in other aspects that haven’t been tackled as much (especially in family oriented fairy tale films). It is because of these skillful touches that BRAVE works far more as a whole than as a sum of its parts!

Grade: B

Blog at WordPress.com.

Up ↑