Review by Derrick Carter

Running Time: 2 hours 13 minutes

MPAA Rating: PG-13 for some Fantasy Action Violence


Directed by: David Yates

Written by: J.K. Rowling

Starring: Eddie Redmayne, Katherine Waterston, Dan Fogler, Alison Sudol, Colin Farrell, Carmen Ejogo, Samantha Morton, Ezra Miller, Ron Perlman & Jon Voight

Five years after the eighth HARRY POTTER film concluded the beloved fantasy franchise, J.K. Rowling’s wizarding world has returned in FANTASTIC BEASTS AND WHERE TO FIND THEM. This is the first in a five-part series that’s been penned for the screen by none other than Rowling herself and that will likely bring excitement to anyone who grew up with HARRY POTTER. Though this first film in the spin-off series suffers from a few narrative problems, this big-budget fantasy is sure to be please hardcore POTTER heads and those who simply want another cinematic dose of wizarding entertainment!


The year is 1926 and the place is New York. Newt Scamander (Eddie Redmayne) is an awkward young wizard with a briefcase full of magical creatures. While other wizards and witches seem content with exterminating fantastical beasts, Newt wishes to save the dwindling species and document their existence in a book (try to guess what it’s titled). However, through an accidental twist of fate, some of Newt’s creatures escape and begin wreaking havoc across New York. With the help of Auror Tina (Katherine Waterston), non-maj Kowalski (Dan Fogler) and psychic Queenie (Alison Sudol), Newt rushes to recapture his escaped creatures before they or potential wizards/humans are harmed. Meanwhile, dangerous dark magic is also loose on the streets of New York and that sort of off-and-on connects to the main plot.


FANTASTIC BEASTS AND WHERE TO FIND THEM doesn’t simply repeat the magical mystery/chosen one formulas that were used in the HARRY POTTER franchise, and instead offers fans and newcomers something fresh in Rowling’s wizarding world. The change of setting to roaring 20’s New York adds a lot of atmosphere and shows us how the magic community functions in America. Small creative background details offer chuckle-worthy visual gags, but the intricately fleshed-out and effects-heavy world simply dazzles before the viewer’s eyes. Though it’s loaded with tons of CGI (like all of the HARRY POTTER films), every frame of the movie looks convincing. FANTASTIC BEASTS more than delivers in sheer spectacle.


The titular beasts themselves are indeed fantastic. These creatures range from whimsical and cute to potentially threatening and dangerous. Newt Scamander’s quest to document their existence and ensure their survival is likely to appeal to animal lovers everywhere, whilst also feeding into the HARRY POTTER meets JUMANJI storyline. Eddie Redmayne has had hits (THE THEORY OF EVERYTHING, THE DANISH GIRL) and misses (JUPITER ASCENDING) in his filmography, but serves as a rock solid lead here. Redmayne’s Newt is far from courageous “chosen one” Harry Potter…and starts off instead as quirky and awkward. Harry was a Gryffindor and Newt is a Hufflepuff. It shows, but offers a new kind of magical hero: an ordinary guy who wants to save magical creatures from mankind and wizardkind alike.


Katherine Waterston makes a serviceable sidekick and heroine to go with the story’s eccentric protagonist, though a love-interest angle between them comes off as forced and unbelievable. Far more enjoyable to watch is Dan Fogler’s stint as a perplexed non-maj (an American Muggle) trying to avoid getting his memory wiped and helping Newt save the day. Alison Sudol makes the most of her scenes and has a fantastic subplot with Fogler. Ron Perlman also makes a brief vocal appearance as a sadly underused goblin gangster.


FANTASTIC BEASTS’s major problem is a subplot that seems out-of-place and unfocused from the main story, even though it does finally form a connection during the final third. The villains and potential antagonists feel like afterthoughts. I’d argue that this subplot was included purely for the purposes of setting up future installments in a very noticeable, borderline distracting fashion. Colin Farrell does what he can to salvage the blatant sequel set-up as a hard-to-read Auror. Ezra Miller slumps his shoulders and cries, contributing next-to-nothing to the main storyline and giving a would-be emotional story arc that feels half-assed. Jon Voight shows up as a news reporter and doesn’t do much. Meanwhile, Samantha Morton seems primed to be a hateful antagonist…and then sort of fades away from the proceedings. This subplot was messy and though it does distract from FANTASTIC BEASTS’s main story, it doesn’t damage the overall movie too badly.


FANTASTIC BEASTS AND WHERE TO FIND THEM is better than three of the HARRY POTTER films (GOBLET OF FIRE, HALF-BLOOD PRINCE, and DEATHLY HALLOWS: Part 1) and reaches the level of SORCERER’S STONE on Rowling’s Wizarding World totem pole. Though BEASTS suffers from noticeable narrative stumbles and a sloppy subplot, it more than delivers in being spectacularly entertaining, giving us a new batch of interesting characters, and making the viewer excited for future installments to come. FANTASTIC BEASTS AND WHERE TO FIND THEM has satisfied a cinematic craving that I didn’t realize I had until this film concluded. Bring on more magical adventures!

Grade: B+


Review by Derrick Carter

Running Time: 1 hour 50 minutes

MPAA Rating: PG-13 for some Intense Action Violence

MI poster

Directed by: Brian De Palma

Written by: David Koepp & Robert Towne

Starring: Tom Cruise, Jon Voight, Emmanuelle Beart, Henry Czerny, Jean Reno, Ving Rhames, Kristin Scott Thomas & Vanessa Redgrave

In the realm of big, dumb popcorn entertainment, things usually don’t get any bigger, dumber and popcornier than 1996’s MISSION: IMPOSSIBLE. This spy thriller broke many records during its release. These included widest release (just over 3,000 screens) and highest opening. Though these records would be shattered shortly down the line (TITANIC was only a year away), the TV show turned summer blockbuster quickly launched a franchise. Seeing as the fifth entry arrives at the end of July and I had never sat through a single MISSION: IMPOSSIBLE movie before (I know), I decided it was high time that I tackle the series. Having just watched this first movie I can declare that it fits squarely in the realm of big, popcorn-munching turn-off-your-brain fun. Nothing more, nothing less.


When there are jobs too difficult, dangerous and complex for the CIA, Interpol, FBI, etc., you call in the IMF (Impossible Missions Force). This super secret organization keeps its members identities a mystery as they need to keep under the radar in order to be highly skilled at their work. Ethan Hunt is an IMF agent who has undertaken his latest assignment. This involves retrieving a confidential list from a group of very bad people who plan on revealing the identities of every IMF agent (therefore making them ineffective and putting their lives in danger). When the mission goes horribly wrong and Ethan Hunt is framed for being a mole, he goes on the run. With IMF hunting Hunt (see what I did there?), he can only rely on a very select group of people to help him clear his name, keep the list safe, and undercover the real mole inside of his team.


The screenplay of MISSION: IMPOSSIBLE is a silly one. At first, the plot seems to be fairly simple, but then we keep getting new twists and turns that really don’t make too much sense when you think about them. However, they do serve as excuses for plenty of cool scenes. That’s the main purpose of this film it seems: being cool. You’re thrown right into this world of espionage and ridiculous gadgets. The viewer is automatically expected to care about each of these agents, but the movie moves at such a fast pace that I didn’t really care about anyone that much aside from Tom Cruise (because he’s our leading man) and Jean Reno (because it’s always nice to see LEON in any movie). I was having a fun with how wild and crazy MISSION: IMPOSSIBLE is, though it definitely reaches near John McClane levels of over-the-top absurdity by the conclusion.


While most of the scenes are enjoyable in a purely dumb fun sense, including Ethan’s showdown with a helicopter whilst on top of a speeding train, there are a couple of moments where things get a little too bombastic. One scene in particular made me laugh but not in a good way. It’s involves gallons upon gallons of water spilling out in slow motion from a giant aquarium with broken glass and fish flying everywhere, all while Tom Cruise narrowly escapes its path in super slow-motion. You can tell that the scene clearly took a lot of effort to film and a lot of money (as well as water) to spill, but I found it all to be a bit…much. This all being said, a majority of MISSION: IMPOSSIBLE moves at a pace so fast that you won’t find yourself able to nitpick many problems while you’re watching the film. My favorite part of the entire movie is the iconic break-in sequence that involves getting through three levels of security (lasers, sound & pressure, and heat). Every ounce of possible suspense is milked from that long and exciting piece of the story.


MISSION: IMPOSSIBLE is one of those movies that requires you to turn off your brain and simply enjoy a big dumb popcorn movie on its own merits. I’m not necessarily what you’d call a Tom Cruise fan, but found him to be a cool leading man in this obvious summer blockbuster. This film took the country by storm at its time of release and its easy to see why that is. MISSION: IMPOSSIBLE is exciting, ridiculous and a lot of fun. All flaws considered, it’s a wholly entertaining ride!

Grade: B

Blog at

Up ↑